Contract
{
"type": "object",
"required": [
"keyword"
],
"properties": {
"keyword": {
"type": "string",
"description": "关键词,如学校名称或所在地区 / Keyword, such as school name or location"
}
},
"additionalProperties": false
}{
"type": "object",
"required": [
"schools"
],
"properties": {
"schools": {
"type": "array",
"items": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"name": {
"type": "string",
"description": "The school's public name, in Chinese."
}
},
"additionalProperties": false
},
"description": "Matching schools, ranked by Douyin's own search relevance. 300 entries on a broad keyword ('北京', a city name), 7 entries on a narrow one ('上海交通大学', an exact university name) -- both real calls observed. Behavior for a keyword with zero matches is unconfirmed (never observed on either real calibration call)."
}
},
"description": "The school search result, as returned at routing.responseResultPath ($.output).",
"additionalProperties": false
}Pricing
Every real charge, itemised. A model that quietly omits one is a slow financial leak, so nothing here is rolled up, and a charge that only applies to some inputs says so rather than being added in.
Prices in this catalog are the provider's own list price, not your bill: Omnial MCP charges provider cost plus a platform markup on top, so what you are charged is higher than the figure shown. For the exact amount a specific call will cost, run omnial_execute with dry_run: true; that number includes the markup and is what we hold while the call runs. It is a quote, not a cap on the charge.
| Charge | Rate |
|---|---|
Per call Flat, regardless of what comes back | $0.020475 |
- Cost basis
- Not recorded
This tool's catalog entry does not record how its final bill is determined, so we will not tell you whether its cost is fixed before the call or reported by the provider afterwards. Either way what is held is a quote rather than a cap: you are charged what the call actually costs, bounded at 2x the quote.
- Updated
- Sep 23, 2026
