Contract
input_schema.json
{
"type": "object",
"required": [
"o_author_id"
],
"properties": {
"industy_tag": {
"type": "integer",
"default": 0,
"description": "Industry tag, 0=unlimited"
},
"o_author_id": {
"type": "string",
"examples": [
"7589271892177518598"
],
"description": "Creator ID"
},
"platform_source": {
"type": "integer",
"default": 1,
"examples": [
1
],
"description": "Platform source"
},
"platform_channel": {
"type": "integer",
"default": 1,
"examples": [
1
],
"description": "Platform channel"
}
},
"additionalProperties": false
}output_schema.json
{
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"cp_index": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"rank": {
"type": "string",
"description": "The creator's rank as a string-form number, e.g. \"84206\"; a string even though it looks numeric."
},
"value": {
"type": "number",
"description": "Current index score, e.g. 67.06 on the one real call observed."
},
"avg_value": {
"type": "number",
"description": "Average index score, e.g. 64.07 on the one real call observed."
},
"rank_percent": {
"type": "number",
"description": "Percentile among creators as a decimal fraction, e.g. 0.0389 = 3.89%; lower is better. One real call observed."
},
"link_relative_ratio": {
"type": "number",
"description": "Signed relative-change ratio, e.g. 0 = flat on the one real call observed; not a percentage."
}
},
"description": "A second content index block whose exact business meaning is not documented in the response or the fixtures -- only its five-field numeric shape is observed. Do not assume a specific definition beyond 'an additional content/cooperation-style score'.",
"additionalProperties": true
},
"base_resp": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"status_code": {
"type": "number"
},
"status_message": {
"type": "string"
}
},
"description": "The endpoint's own status envelope. `status_code: 0` with an empty `status_message` on the one successful call observed; a non-zero status or a populated message shape is unconfirmed.",
"additionalProperties": true
},
"cooperate_index": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"rank": {
"type": "string",
"description": "The creator's rank as a string-form number, e.g. \"138902\"; a string even though it looks numeric."
},
"value": {
"type": "number",
"description": "Current index score, e.g. 75.71 on the one real call observed."
},
"avg_value": {
"type": "number",
"description": "Average index score, e.g. 75.55 on the one real call observed."
},
"rank_percent": {
"type": "number",
"description": "Percentile among creators as a decimal fraction, e.g. 0.0641 = 6.41%; lower is better. One real call observed."
},
"link_relative_ratio": {
"type": "number",
"description": "Signed relative-change ratio, e.g. 0 = flat on the one real call observed; not a percentage."
}
},
"description": "Cooperation-link marketing index for the creator -- how the creator performs on cooperation/collaboration links.",
"additionalProperties": true
},
"link_star_index": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"rank": {
"type": "string",
"description": "The creator's rank as a string-form number, e.g. \"272253\"; a string even though it looks numeric."
},
"value": {
"type": "number",
"description": "Current index score, e.g. 55.56 on the one real call observed."
},
"avg_value": {
"type": "number",
"description": "Average index score, e.g. 56.23 on the one real call observed."
},
"rank_percent": {
"type": "number",
"description": "Percentile among creators as a decimal fraction, e.g. 0.1257 = 12.57%; lower is better. One real call observed."
},
"link_relative_ratio": {
"type": "number",
"description": "Signed relative-change ratio, e.g. 0.0062 = up roughly 0.6% on the one real call observed; not a percentage."
}
},
"description": "Star index for the creator -- a star-rating-style measure of the creator's quality for sponsored links.",
"additionalProperties": true
},
"link_spread_index": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"rank": {
"type": "string",
"description": "The creator's rank as a string-form number, e.g. \"275106\"; a string even though it looks numeric."
},
"value": {
"type": "number",
"description": "Current index score, e.g. 49.99 on the one real call observed."
},
"avg_value": {
"type": "number",
"description": "Average index score, e.g. 53.14 on the one real call observed."
},
"rank_percent": {
"type": "number",
"description": "Percentile among creators as a decimal fraction, e.g. 0.127 = 12.7%; lower is better. One real call observed."
},
"link_relative_ratio": {
"type": "number",
"description": "Signed relative-change ratio, e.g. -0.0215 = down roughly 2.2% on the one real call observed; not a percentage."
}
},
"description": "Link-spread index for the creator -- how widely the creator's links are distributed or shared.",
"additionalProperties": true
},
"link_convert_index": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"rank": {
"type": "string",
"description": "The creator's rank as a string-form number, e.g. \"388342\"; a string even though it looks numeric."
},
"value": {
"type": "number",
"description": "Current index score, e.g. 38.71 on the one real call observed."
},
"avg_value": {
"type": "number",
"description": "Average index score, e.g. 55.23 on the one real call observed."
},
"rank_percent": {
"type": "number",
"description": "Percentile among creators as a decimal fraction, e.g. 0.1793 = 17.93%; lower is better. One real call observed."
},
"link_relative_ratio": {
"type": "number",
"description": "Signed relative-change ratio, e.g. 0.1632 = up roughly 16.3% on the one real call observed; not a percentage."
}
},
"description": "Link-conversion index for the creator -- how effectively the creator's shared links convert.",
"additionalProperties": true
},
"link_shopping_index": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"rank": {
"type": "string",
"description": "The creator's rank as a string-form number, e.g. \"311418\"; a string even though it looks numeric."
},
"value": {
"type": "number",
"description": "Current index score, e.g. 46.35 on the one real call observed."
},
"avg_value": {
"type": "number",
"description": "Average index score, e.g. 53.3 on the one real call observed."
},
"rank_percent": {
"type": "number",
"description": "Percentile among creators as a decimal fraction, e.g. 0.1437 = 14.37%; lower is better. One real call observed."
},
"link_relative_ratio": {
"type": "number",
"description": "Signed relative-change ratio, e.g. -0.0537 = down roughly 5.4% on the one real call observed; not a percentage."
}
},
"description": "Shopping-link index for the creator -- performance of the creator's product/shopping links.",
"additionalProperties": true
}
},
"description": "The creator's marketing performance record, as returned at routing.responseResultPath ($.output). Observed as `{}` (no fields at all) when the given `o_author_id` does not resolve to an existing creator -- confirmed against the author-not-found fixture. Every index-block shape below was observed on a single resolved call; each field's description says what is confirmed versus assumed.",
"additionalProperties": true
}Pricing
Every real charge, itemised. A model that quietly omits one is a slow financial leak, so nothing here is rolled up, and a charge that only applies to some inputs says so rather than being added in.
Prices in this catalog are the provider's own list price, not your bill: Omnial MCP charges provider cost plus a platform markup on top, so what you are charged is higher than the figure shown. For the exact amount a specific call will cost, run omnial_execute with dry_run: true; that number includes the markup and is what we hold while the call runs. It is a quote, not a cap on the charge.
| Charge | Rate |
|---|---|
Per call Flat, regardless of what comes back | $0.004095 |
- Cost basis
- Not recorded
This tool's catalog entry does not record how its final bill is determined, so we will not tell you whether its cost is fixed before the call or reported by the provider afterwards. Either way what is held is a quote rather than a cap: you are charged what the call actually costs, bounded at 2x the quote.
- Updated
- Sep 25, 2026